A bond revocation hearing was held Wednesday, May 27, in the 253rd State District Court with Judge Chap Cain presiding.
The hearing centered on local attorney Emily Cook, who was indicted in March 2026 on a charge of Misappropriation of Fiduciary or Financial Property stemming from her time serving on the Liberty County Housing Authority Board.
After hearing testimony and arguments from Assistant District Attorney Anna Emmons and Cook’s attorney, Erin Epley, Judge Cain ruled that Cook violated the conditions of her bond. He ordered that Cook be placed on a new $75,000 bond and wear a GPS-equipped ankle monitor until her case is resolved.
The hearing focused heavily on allegations that Cook violated conditions prohibiting her from having contact with anyone associated with Meals on Wheels of South Liberty County, TUFF Kids, Grace Church, or anyone connected to those entities from 2019 to the present.
Cook previously arranged for Russell Payne, managing editor of The Vindicator, to serve on the Meals on Wheels board.
The agreed bond order also required Cook to avoid persons of “disreputable or harmful character,” and prosecutors argued Payne’s criminal history placed him within that restriction as well.
Epley argued throughout the hearing that the bond conditions were ambiguous.
Local attorney Gilberto Flores, who shares an office building at Trinity and Main with The Vindicator and Meals on Wheels, testified that he alerted the District Attorney’s Office after witnessing what he believed to be a violation of Cook’s bond conditions.
Flores testified that he and Cook had scheduled a meeting regarding a legal matter for May 13 at her office.
“Did you intentionally want to meet her at her office?” Emmons asked.
“Yes, I was aware of the case … and I was concerned that she would expose herself by speaking to Russell,” Flores replied.
Flores testified that he attempted to contact Cook and spoke with someone at her office about meeting at her office. However, Cook later texted him and suggested meeting at his office instead. Copies of text messages between Flores and Cook were introduced into evidence.
According to Flores, Cook arrived at the office building while he was away. Payne was the only person there at the time. Rather than waiting in her vehicle, Cook entered the building and waited in his office for approximately 15 minutes until Flores arrived. In the text message exchange, Flores questioned Cook on whether being at his building would expose her to a bond violation, but she brushed it off.
Flores testified that he believed the bond conditions were standard and not ambiguous.
When asked whether he was bothered by the alleged violation, Flores said, “Emily is an attorney and she is under indictment. Any attorney under indictment should follow the rules, particularly of bond conditions. After she was indicted she decided to run for district attorney.”
During cross-examination, Epley questioned Flores about why he waited several days before reporting the incident to authorities.
Flores testified that he spent several days thinking about the situation before reporting it to the District Attorney’s Office after the weekend.
He also testified that Cook was a close friend of Payne’s and believed she knew Meals on Wheels was headquartered in the same building as his law office and The Vindicator.
Flores was asked whether he was aware and had read an article about Cook’s case published in The Vindicator on May 15.
“They have a paywall and you can’t read the article if you don’t subscribe. I don’t subscribe to The Vindicator,” Flores replied.
Flores further testified that as Cook was leaving the building following their meeting, she shouted, “Goodbye to all the people I love here.”
He also stated that later that day he, Payne and Vindicator publisher Jennifer Richardson drove together to look at a property, and he felt Cook behaved as though she believed she had “gotten away with something.”
Richardson later testified that she previously advised Cook to avoid entering The Vindicator office and instead have her husband pick up newspapers for her.
“What is your understanding of the bond conditions in relation to Russell Payne?” Emmons asked Richardson.
“I understood that due to him being on the [Meals on Wheels] board that they were not supposed to have any contact. That’s how I interpreted it,” Richardson replied.
Richardson also was questioned about the bond condition requiring Cook to avoid persons of disreputable character, referring to Payne and his past criminal history.
“I hired him. He has not shown signs of drug use. He has been straight up. I know he goes to church every Sunday. He is the children’s minister,” Richardson said of Payne.
Payne testified next and said he has worked for The Vindicator for six years during his current stint and also worked there previously in earlier years.
He testified that he joined the Meals on Wheels board approximately one year ago after being asked by Cook and Hannah Taylor.
Payne acknowledged that he was aware Cook was prohibited from contacting him because of his Meals on Wheels affiliation.
He also admitted that Cook had relayed friendly messages to him through mutual acquaintances.
Payne testified that he was surprised when Cook appeared at the office on May 13.
“What the hell are you doing here?” Payne testified that he asked her.
He said he contacted Flores to notify him that Cook had arrived and testified that Cook then went into Flores’ office while he returned to his own office. He claimed they had no further communication.
Emmons questioned Payne about conversations later that day during a car ride with Flores and Richardson.
“Do you remember saying that the defendant is giving the middle finger to the justice system?” Emmons asked.
Payne replied that he did not specifically recall saying it but acknowledged it sounded like something he might say.
Brenda Fairchild, who supervises between 250 and 275 people currently on bond, also testified.
Fairchild explained that bond violations are normally reported directly to her office, though some are instead reported to the District Attorney’s Office, as happened in Cook’s case.
She also testified that Cook previously contacted her office several times with questions regarding her bond conditions.
Epley argued that the original agreed bond order was rushed and that Cook did not have sufficient time to review it carefully. However, the agreed bond was signed by Judge Robert Trapp and parties on Tuesday, March 24, not a weekend or a Friday.
After hearing all testimony, Judge Cain ruled that Cook violated the conditions of her bond.
“This was an agreed bond and she is bound by the terms of it,” Cain said.
The judge stated that Payne was clearly associated with Meals on Wheels and that Cook had reason to believe Payne would be present at The Vindicator office.
During the ruling, Epley interrupted the judge several times before Cain responded, “Don’t interrupt me” and ordered her to sit down while he finished his ruling. He put great emphasis on the fact that this was an agreed bond that Cook had violated.
“She made contact with Russell Payne, violating condition 12. Therefore she violated the terms of her bond. We will set a new bond of $75,000,” Cain ruled.
In addition to the new bond amount, Cain ordered Cook to wear a GPS ankle monitor until her case is resolved. All previously imposed bond conditions remain in place.
After the hearing, Cook was transported once again to the county jail, where she had to arrange for her new bond and ankle monitor before being released.
SEE RELATED:
Cook announces 2028 DA bid hours after felony indictment
Wow. Cain really has it out for her. He leaves the bench soon and that is a very good thing.
Can you read what she did? Cain is doing his job you A..h..e.