Eminent domain remains a threat to property owners



By Gene Hall

The summer movie, Little Pink House, has focused attention on the unfairness of eminent domain. The movie looks back to the 2005 taking of the home owned by Suzette Kelo.

In the case of Kelo versus New London, Kelo had sued that Connecticut city over the condemnation of her property. The city planned development of the land for economic development. Kelo lost in the Supreme Court.

Texas passed a law to prevent that sort of thing, but it can be quirky in practice.

Eminent domain, the taking of property by the government or public utilities, does serve a public need. However, the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution is very clear on the issue of compensation.

In Texas, property owners do not always get good faith offers. Those with resources and the will to challenge the process are often successful. Others, without deep pockets, take low-ball offers, knowing property takers can outlast them in court.

Some of us believe Texas law should require a good faith offer. The Legislature gets another shot at that in January.

Previous articleMan arrested for drugs during routine traffic stop by LCSO deputy
Next articleJessie Leo McCollough
Before creating Bluebonnet News in 2018, Vanesa Brashier was a community editor for the Houston Chronicle/Houston Community Newspapers. During part of her 12 years at the newspapers, she was assigned as the digital editor and managing editor for the Humble Observer, Kingwood Observer, East Montgomery County Observer and the Lake Houston Observer, and the editor of the Dayton News, Cleveland Advocate and Eastex Advocate. Over the years, she has earned more than two dozen writing awards, including Journalist of the Year.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.